Search for: "People v Thomas Van Every"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
McReynolds and Willis Van Devanter aligned closely with the new chief’s social and political views. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
Some people said sadly as a joke that Justice Thomas had the courage of Justice Scalia's opinions. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Thomas of Maryland, “safe to be trusted with the destinies of a great nation and of an injured and magnanimous people. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
What constitutes “unauthorized access” is itself a jurisprudential morass (see, e.g., every CFAA ruling since Van Buren), and it’s not credible to use any definition with the phrase “some nefarious purpose. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The perpetual Union remained under the Constitution, which every state supported and endorsed. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Grewel (cert. denied 2020, with Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh dissenting). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Thomas Rid and Brandon Van Grack to discuss the Justice Department indictment of Russian national Aleksandr Ionov: Scott Roehm argued that Biden administration officials need to reject the use of evidence obtained by torture in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The amount of political fundraising conducted over email and text has exploded in recent years, adding to the deluge of promotional messages swamping Americans every day. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 11:23 pm
(I too have long questioned standing in cases like Van Orden v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
Read the statement from Professor Barbara van Schewick (professor of law at Stanford University and the director of Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society) who testified at every hearing on the bill, and filed two amicus briefs on the key issues in the case, here. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal found for the Claimant on almost every issue. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Justice Clarence Thomas is next. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am
The speculators in Fletcher v. [read post]
