Search for: "People v Wager"
Results 1 - 20
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
A person takes bets from various people in relation to a sporting event, controlling monies wagered on the outcome and registered the bet for payout. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
The focus of the book is on modes of proof that would have struck people of his age (and of ours, for the most part), as lacking all credibility: wager of law; judicial combat, judicial ordeals and torture. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 2:13 pm
In the landmark case Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:58 pm
Maybe lots of people in the White House thought that as well. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
So method number one, is what most people are familiar with, is just regular symbolic AI. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
” Quick links Philip Cowley and Alan Wager, Theos: Does the British Electorate Mind Politicians Doing God? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am
On Monday, in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
It's not yet known how much people wagered on the contest via legal sportsbooks, but the industry's trade association has estimated $1 billion. . . . [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
In 2008, District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
Co., 480 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1973). 5 White v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 2:38 pm
Salinas v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
Remember, in NFIB v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
" The President, Fessenden contended, has the right to communicate with the People. [read post]
