Search for: "People v Whitaker"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
The cost of default Brian Whitaker, Pl., v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Was Whitaker invalidly appointed, thus making the rule itself invalid? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Feb. 22, 2022), and Whitaker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
To this the Court replied: The refusal to serve food to pedestrians at drive-through windows does not impact blind people differently or in a greater manner than the significant population of non-disabled people who lack access to motor vehicles. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 am
Like Delacroix’s inspirational painting of Liberty Leading the People, celebrations of freedom from abusive ADA and FHA litigation may be premature. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:05 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Oct. 20, 2020), Brian Whitaker v. 1810 Downtown Rest., Corp., et al, 2020 WL 6493748, at *5 (C.D. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Yafai v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
On Jan. 6, 2019, President Trump said he was in “no hurry” to get his cabinet members confirmed: “I sort of like ‘acting’ [because] it gives me more flexibility; do you understand that? [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:05 pm
So, for example, in Whitaker By Whitaker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
.: The House Committee on the Judiciary will hear testimony from Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker for the first congressional oversight hearing of the 116th Congress. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
Whitaker (D.D.C. filed Jan. 15, 2019) argues that this violates the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am
In Toshiba Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Sarah Grant provided an update on the litigation challenging the Trump administration’s proposed ban on transgender people serving in the military. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
., who until now recused himself in a pending copyright case, Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Fortunately, Whitaker did not get the job, sparing that court of having to endure his bedrock judicial philosophy; namely, that judges should be Christians who rely on the Bible over the Constitution to make decisions; that the judicial branch should be inferior to the other two branches of government; and that the landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. [read post]
