Search for: "People v. Andrus" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by John Elwood
So I’m ending this post by noting that one much-rescheduled and -relisted case left us this week: Andrus v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 26 conference) Returning Relists Andrus v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am by John Elwood
(kinda-sorta relisted after the May 19 conference) Returning Relists Andrus v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Texas, 21-6001Issues: (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am by John Elwood
Unfortunately for Grzegorczyk (but fortunately for a half-dozen other people), they were federal agents. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm by John Floyd
The only issue for Justice Alito was that Andrus had killed “two innocent people” and, therefore, should be put to death. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:48 pm by Amy Howe
The justices revived the case of Terence Andrus, a Texas inmate who was sentenced to death for the 2008 shootings of two people during an attempted carjacking in a grocery-store parking lot. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
And the two serial relists, Andrus v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 27 conference)   Returning Relists   Andrus v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 20 conference)   Returning Relists   Andrus v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 6 conference)   Returning Relists   Andrus v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
   · Molly Burich, Director of Public Policy, Boehringer Ingelheim   · Surya Singh, President, Singh Healthcare Advisors, LLC  Moderated Panel Discussion  Meredyth Andrus, Attorney, Health Care Division, Bureau of Competition, FTC Does the designation of interchangeability still have value in the US? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
The case is a follow-on to the similarly famous Masterpiece Cakeshop, involving a state’s ability to compel people with religious objections to same-sex marriage to use their artistic talents for such ceremonies. [read post]