Search for: "People v. Austin (1980)"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Last week, Judge Rosenstengel found Wells’ opinion so infected by invalid methodologies and inferences as to be inadmissible under the most recent version of Rule 702.[1] Summary judgment in the trial cases followed.[2] Back in the 1980s, paraquat gained some legal notoriety in one of the most retrograde Rule 702 decisions.[3] Both the herbicide and Rule 702, however, and they remain in wide use. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Two epidemiologic studies of PPA and hemorrhagic stroke were conducted in the 1980s. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
During his campaign for president in 1980, Ronald Reagan had promised to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1980); United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Unlike the conservative court of the 1980s and 1990s that helped form the worldview of much of the present legal academy, the current right-wing Court has abandoned any semblance of good faith normal-science cons [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I notice just as many Ukrainian flags on Austin streets as I do U.S. ones. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Peoples Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Peoples Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Peoples Fed. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
University of Texas at Austin (echoing the blockbuster Grutter v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308, 316-17 (1980); Org. for Better Austin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
In the case of all natural rights, the people understood that the government’s role was to preserve natural rights against interference from private actors and to restrain the exercise of these natural rights in circumstances where the people’s representatives in the legislature had determined that such restraint was for the public good. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
BACKGROUND[1]Zargari purchased jewelry from Kay Jewelers on May 6, 2005 in Austin, Texas. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am
Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308, 311, 316 (1980) (preliminary injunctions against the showing of films “that have not been finally adjudicated to be obscene” are generally unconstitutional prior restraints); Auburn Police Union v. [read post]
