Search for: "People v. Barnhill" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Barnhill, 212 A.3d 805 (Del. 2019), a well-known duty of oversight decision from the Supreme Court of Delaware. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Barnhill, Delaware courts have sustained a number of breach of the duty of oversight claims. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In December 2018, the directors learned that the company’s Global Chief People Officer, David Fairhurst, had allegedly engaged in an act of sexual harassment, the investigation of which uncovered that in 2016 the same individual had engaged in a prior incident of sexual harassment. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
Background From 2015 through his termination for cause in 2019, David Fairhurst served as Executive Vice President and Global Chief People Office of McDonald’s. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 2:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In a concluding section, Vice Chancellor Will noted that the data breach at the center of the case “was momentous in scale and put the data of hundreds of millions of people at risk. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Ann Lipton
Barnhill, a lot people wondered – including, ahem, me – whether it heralded a new approach to Caremark claims. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 1:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, in the landmark June 2019 decision of Marchand v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The significance of these oversight responsibilities appears even greater in light of the Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in Marchand v. [read post]