Search for: "People v. Bills (1995)"
Results 1 - 20
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Over lunch, Egilman explained to me that he considered himself a Marxist-Leninist, his term, and that the day would come when people like him would have to kill people like me, again his language. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
This case, which concerns the constitutionality of the CorporateTransparency Act, illustrates that principle.2When Congress passed the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, itincluded a bill called the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Our animation - which has been viewed more than a MILLION times on TikTok in the last 24 hours - exposes the brutality inherent in hare coursing, as we put forward our case for the Hunting of Mammals Bill, a piece of legislation which we believe would finally see an end to all hunting with dogs. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
The people that know you best are also the people that can hurt you the most. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
As a brief introduction, the Presentation of the aforementioned Bill made by the same author also appears. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm
Francis, 165 Ill. 2d 150 (1995). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm
Francis, 165 Ill. 2d 150 (1995). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm
Francis, 165 Ill. 2d 150 (1995). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
Consequently, absences for ART treatment can still be dealt with in the same way as other forms of illness absence without being discriminatory (London Borough of Greenwich v Robinson (unreported; [1995] UKEAT 745)). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
