Search for: "People v. Brim" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2023, 7:56 am by Dan Farber
Their decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am by Michael Froomkin
And remember that even a lot of people who turn out on primary day don’t bother to fill in the judicial part of the ballot. [read post]
  It’s about 3 people who were arrested by a DRE in Cobb County, Georgia, for DUI-marijuana. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:13 am
— suffer from the feeling that other people are angry at me. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Slate’s Amicus podcast features a discussion of Gill v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:01 am by Benjamin Wittes
Here's the complaint I filed, represented by the folks at the Protect Democracy Project:    Wittes v FBI Complaint (PDF)Wittes v FBI Complaint (Text) Who knows? [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Interestingly, the speaker noted that although ASI had no customers in the UK, 90% of the traffic to its website came from people in the UK (presumably looking for argos.co.uk).The Judge held that ASI’s site was not targeted at UK consumers and so ASI did not use the sign ARGOS within the UK (hence there could be no infringement). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
As Pinker writes, “an adult mind that is brimming with chunks is a powerful engine of reason”. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a third reason for the application of the statutory percentage to the total parental income, is that courts, including the Appellate Division, Second Department, have, in fact, routinely applied the statutory formula to combined parental income as high as and greater than $200,000 (see Scheinkman, New York Law of Domestic Relations, § 16.34, at 679; compare Matter of Brim v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
It suggest as well that the core object of the CCP's political work is to socialize all people within the structures and premises of Chinese Marxist Leninism, now  developed under its new names--socialist modernization, socialist democracy, and socialist rule of law. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
, with his gift to landlords all, the case of Spencer v Taylor ably covered by Tessa earlier this week so I wont labour the point here. [read post]