Search for: "People v. Brooks (1979)"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
People who had to figure out a way to pay for their mortgage, education, retirement, and so on. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Ct. 1970, 1979 (2021) (quoting Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
People have, for example, ‘imaginary friends’, but they rarely have ‘imaginaries’ (Brigitte Nerlich, Imagining imaginaries, University of Nottingham Blog (23 April 2015) with a nice summary explanation of the evolution and expansion of the term within the social sciences)Whatever its pedigree, the term is useful here. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
App. 1979) (cited in State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
App. 1979) (cited in State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
’Zahorik v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
, Brookings Sept. 2011)The report of the activities of Special Procedures covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2014 can be accessed here. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1975-1979. 10. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
Just do it, people. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
This has been the case since the state Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Sedars v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:20 pm
, Mel Brooks Starts Nonprofit Foundation to Save Word 'Schmuck') Naturally, something this important must have a California appellate angle: Enter footnote 2 in People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:19 am
Smith I like you people, but you are sentimental shits. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 559 (1979). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
