Search for: "People v. Chambers (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
Tragically, Justice Arif Iqbal Bhatti, who presided over the case, was later assassinated in his chambers at the Lahore High Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
J., in chambers) (quoting New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
In a judgment after only the second phone hacking trial Fancourt J held that phone hacking had been habitual and widespread at The Daily Mirror, The Sunday Mirror and The People newspapers from 1998 until 2006, and had continued extensively but on a reducing basis from 2007 until 2011. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
See Chambers v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
He noted, however, that in Vavricka and Others v the Czech Republic [GC], 8 April 2021, about the legality of the Czech compulsory system of infant vaccination, the Grand Chamber had rejected the applicants’ Article 9 claim “on the basis that the ‘beliefs’ relied upon as founding the objection to vaccination, which were not grounded in religion, were insufficiently cogent, serious, cohesive and important to attract the guarantees of Article 9” [18]. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:14 am
PanamaSilva v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 11:30 am
In a detailed judgment, HHJ Backhouse held: “in chambers” meant the kind of hearing that under the County Court Rules 1981 would have been heard in chambers (rather than in open court), even though the term was not used in the CPR from 1998 onwards. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am
It incinerated, instead, millions of innocent peoples’ lives in the gas chambers and crematoria of Auschwitz, Birkenau, and other Nazi concentration camps. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
