Search for: "People v. Collins (1981)"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
EPA is not a “protector of the people. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
Likewise for Twitter letting people go to individual pages such as http://twitter.com/RealDonaldTrump, Facebook letting people to go to individual Facebook pages, YouTube letting people view individual videos, and the like. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
COLLINS, Judge. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am
It is a way of saying that certain issues are settled, even if people in an earlier era disagreed. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Collins,985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993)); Barksdale v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
The Supreme Court handed down Collins v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:06 pm
The Supreme Court scene isn't long, but it's powerful.First Monday in October (1981). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
In People v Collins, 60 NY2d 214, 218 [1983], the Court of Appeals held that voice identifications are subject to the same concerns relative to suggestiveness, and same constitutional safeguards, as visual identifications (see also, People v McRae, 195 AD2d 180, 185 [1st Dept 1994]; People v Shepard, 162 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1990], lv den, 76 NY2d 944). [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am
However, we shouldn't lose sight of where the Jason Collins milestone fits into the long history of openly LGBT people's participation in American professional sports. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
This legislative history is narrated in DPP v Collins (para 6), a very interesting decision on s 127, involving a man who made repeated telephone to his local MP's office asking for him to do something about the "black bastards" - or similar terms. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
(People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
But nine years later, in Collins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
He thought so in 1981 and he thinks so now. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:02 am
Mission Ready Mix (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 104, 113-144] and matters beyond common experience [People v. [read post]
