Search for: "People v. Collins (1992)" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And in Cooney v Minister for the Environment [2007] 1 IR 296, [2006] IESC 61 (13 November 2006) the Supreme Court upheld a requirement in section 46(5) of the Electoral Act, 1992 (also here) as amended by section 1 of the Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2002 (also here) that general election candidates who are not members of registered political parties should be described on nomination and ballot papers as “Non-Party”… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
  I also want to  wish you, and all thefriends of the people ofthe United  States of  America,  a  happy Fourth of July. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
If enforced, the rule might have removed nearly 700,000 people from the program. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
For understanding virtue and the ethics of technology, we can look to a Christianity emphasizing universal love and reconciliation for all people, of all types (including race, gender, sexual orientation). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Human Rights Policy cites R. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Fort Collins, 916 F.3d 792, 802–05 (10th Cir. 2019) (equal protection challenge to ordinance prohibiting women from exposing nipple likely to succeed on merits); People v. [read post]