Search for: "People v. Correa"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 9:33 am
Correa, People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:43 pm
Three bizarre decisions as of late, one which deals tangentially with no fault (Garcia v Leon, 2010 NY Slip Op 01538 [1st Dept 2010]), one which effects the safety of no-fault attorneys going to court in the bronx (People v Correa, 2010 NY Slip Op 01533 [1st Dept. 2010]) [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Chief Judge Kozinski is very good at writing opinions that make other people look bad. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
On February 23, 2010 a divided Panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, New York Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
On February 23, 2010 a divided Panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, New York Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm
On October 2, while the news covered President Trump’s admission to Walter Reed for treatment of Covid-19, Congressmen Lou Correa (D-CA) and Ted Budd (R-NC) introduced the bipartisan Online Accessibility Act, which they claim will “increase website accessibility and reduce predatory lawsuits filed against businesses. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
Chung has continued his battle to the California Supreme Court, which has deferred briefing until the Court has the opportunity to review another case, People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
President Rafael Correa had successfully sued the newspaper, but said he "never sought to bankrupt anyone. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:21 am
The students argued the merits of the case of People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
People v. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
See Pfiffner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court Decision in Rothgery v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 1967; People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
The Bandung Conference and Latin America: a decolonial dialogue with Oscar Correas. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:02 am
” (People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
It also brings in the rationale the constitutional doctrine of US Supreme Court toward its paradigmatic authority in interpreting democracy and civil liberties, citing Freedman v. [read post]
