Search for: "People v. Crow (1994)" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He served as dean of the law school from 1987-1994 and provost of the University of Chicago from 1994-2002. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Robin: While I was writing this book, I constantly had people, the most well meaning, liberal-minded people, tell me who Thomas is and what he thinks. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
By the time the outbreak was over, more than 700 people had been infected. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Board of Education, declaring Jim Crow-era racial segregation of schools unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
(Our e-reserve people do a great job streaming films through the course site upon request.)Sally Hadden: Judgment at Nuremburg, Andersonville TrialDirk Hartog: In my 20th century legal thought class, I use Billy Wilder's The Fortune Cookieand Otto Preminger's Anatomy of a Murder, during weeks on the legal profession. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Some people credit Thompson with framing the question that Sen. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Roger Clegg
It can’t be an observation about growing up as a slave, or under Jim Crow, or during the Civil Rights Era – because the eighteen-year-old students getting these preferences in 2012 were born in, let’s see, 1994, thirty years after the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
However, I have now heard from enough people that seem to sincerely want to know the facts of the situation, and I’m happy to provide them. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:37 am by Steve Hall
This march back to Jim Crow would surely be more difficult if there were more people of color on the federal bench. [read post]