Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
Donny Kevin Davis v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:05 am
Davis, Case No. 282994, holding that People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 9:03 am
Indiana and Davis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
Davis and Prof. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am
Davis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:28 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:12 am
Davis for August 31 at 9:30 in Pasadena. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
Yep, that's why the police went back in and questioned Davis after he invoked -- and why they waited four full days to do so. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeals reconsidered application of the exclusionary rule in People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:59 am
In the case Karen Atala and Daughters v Chile, Professor Davis co-authored the amicus curiae brief arguing that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classes under international law. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
Criminal law — Self-defense — Dissatisfaction with counsel On the evening of 4 November 2019, Ricoh Lamar McClaine, Appellant, fought with Kevin Tyrell Davis in the parking lot of a Popeyes restaurant in Oxon Hill following a dispute that arose between the two after Davis cut into a line of people (Appellant among them) awaiting […] The post RICOH LAMAR MCCLAINE v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
Davis does so. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:41 pm
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 11:02 am
Prior to taking the bench, Davis assisted attorney Thurgood Marshall of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) on the 1954 case that became Brown v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Davis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2006, 1:13 pm
Davis and Hammon were argued on Monday, and now we wait for the decisions. [read post]
