Search for: "People v. Ferguson (1970)" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
A report released during WWII noted that “Most people in this country [i.e., the U.S.], including educated people, know little or nothing about our overseas possessions. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Driver: Harlan’s Plessy dissent claims so many admirers in the modern era largely because people cite an isolated fragment from the opinion. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
Ferguson, the justices refused to read the 14th Amendment to provide any meaningful protections for minorities. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am by Andrew Hamm
Ferguson that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:21 am by Jennifer Lynch
The courts have relied on a legal principle called the “third-party doctrine,” which was developed in two 1970s Supreme Court cases, Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
 But this "Ferguson effect," as it has started to be known, is not the same as sentencing reform. [read post]