Search for: "People v. Ford (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
   (Nixon, being Nixon, fought back, filing suit the day after President Ford signed the legislation. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
Until the mid-1980s, she writes, the Federal Communications Commission regulated media ownership and “broadcasters were held to a standard of public trusteeship, in which the right to use the airwaves came with a mandate to provide for democratic discourse. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
The society started in law schools in the 1980s and now has 200 Law School chapters. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
From the late 1980s into the 1990s, we examined Michael Gerhardt’s comprehensive constitutional history and important essays by Akhil Amar, Ronald Rotunda and Cass Sunstein. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The message of Koni’s memoir about power of courts to reestablish social contract and guarantee people’s rights and dignity was again untimely. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]