Search for: "People v. Haven (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am by Dylan Gibbs
Then she went out of her way to note that prior cases haven’t resolved the issue either. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[9] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[10]This materiality standard is reflected when materiality appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company periodic and current reports.[11] In the 90 years since Roosevelt described the intent of the federal securities laws and the 40 years since Jack’s paper, the core benefits… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
 Pix credit hereCates 1980 has distributed its February 2024 Report. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
One is immediately thrust back to the 1970s and the early 1980s--to the normative workshop of Fidel Castro (Odious Debt Wears Two Faces: Systemic Illegitimacy, Problems, and Opportunities in Traditional Odious Debt Conceptions in Globalized Economic Regimes). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
I submitted an amicus brief on the side of the challengers, arguing that the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority is unconstitutional because its members haven't been appointed consistently with the Appointments Clause. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am by Richard Hunt
By the time the ADA and FHA were passed in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s testing was very widely used by civil rights organizations to find and prosecute discriminatory conduct and had the imprimatur of the Supreme Court in the Havens case. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Key aspects of our rules for the national market system haven’t been updated since 2005. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:37 am
I think I know why: When Justice Scalia brought it up (very inartfully) at the 2015 oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Participating in the conflict seems to involve the kind of “honor” that we haven’t seen for some 60 years. [read post]