Search for: "People v. Hernandez (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Anderson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
See also, e.g., Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 7:24 am
Abbassi against high-level executive officials enacting post-9/11 national-security policy and in Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Annulis, 852 So.2d 430, 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:53 am
There they were, at the start of the 5-4 decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
§ 1983.) [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Corp., 425 So. 2d 171, 171-72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Div. 2006) (same); People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Tersigni v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
They don’t get exemptions, though, because of the “broad [and compelling] public interest in maintaining a sound tax system” (Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
Lee (1982), as interpreted by Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:54 am
Her public employer did not need for her testimony to be actually impeached at a hearing in order to show that her comments created a substantial disruption in the workplace (Shepherd v McGee, November 7, 2013, Hernandez, M). [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:15 am
After Teague v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:08 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
