Search for: "People v. Ho"
Results 1 - 20
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
Batok in the east, aloha in the west: intellectual property protections of Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines and the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
Justice Thomas stresses (as Judge Ho did in his separate Fifth Circuit opinion) that: This case is not about whether States can disarm people who threaten others. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
But the Ho-Branch boycott wasn't really on my mind at all. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
From today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:49 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
A long line of cases endorses the principle that “[w]ho is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial, but is a political question, the determin [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Here is the entire complaint: Kestenbaum v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
On further appeal, the High Court held that ACL s 23 does apply to Mr Ho’s contract, with the result that the class action waiver clause was void: Karpik v Carnival plc [2023] HCA 39. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm
This Fifth Circuit ruling is remarkable, not so much for its holding that a Texas man had a qualified right to confront witnesses against him in a hearing to revoke his supervised release, but for Judge Ho's concurring opinion, which is basically an amicus brief addressed to the Supreme Court's pending ruling in the Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Judge Ho wrote a four-page concurrence. [read post]
