Search for: "People v. Jackson (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
In South Africa, Abortion is a right codified in law: The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS, comment on the decision from the Supreme Court in Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and Anor. [2023] UKSC 43. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
After graduating from Harvard Law School in 1996, Jackson worked as an attorney at the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Mark MacCarthy
The clear intent in 1996 was to insulate online content distributors from being treated as the publisher of online content in the same way that the Supreme Court’s 1959 Smith v. [read post]