Search for: "People v. Light (1996)"
Results 1 - 20
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
It is about the rights of people who are not intentionally homeless, a frequently highly vulnerable group of people. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
[UPDATE 5/3/24, 11:55 am: This paragraph has been revised in light of the archived version (which I hadn't been able to find when I first put up the post); thanks to commenter ReadMyLips88, who pointed me to the archived version.] [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
In 1996, the courageous decision of 22-year-old Saima Waheed to marry a man of her own choice sparked a legal battle that would resonate across Pakistan. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
After a lengthy recovery period, she was offered light duty work by the same employer. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In 2002, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
State, 267 Ga. 41, 42, 472 S.E.2d 683, 685 (1996) (“[A] conflict of interest would arise if a defense attorney were to ‘switch sides’ and prosecute his former client. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm
” People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
In this case the elaboration of tropes around presumptions of collective psychologies of peoples. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Echoing the film’s resurrection, the copyright in The Passion of Joan of Arc once lapsed, only to be revived in 1996 by the Uruguay Rounds Agreements Act. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Case v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
In People v Byrnes (1948), it was held that public trial means that it is not restricted to any particular class of the community but is freely open to all. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
These facts came to light through the many lawsuits filed against the Gallery and in the Gallery’s bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
Bear in mind that the last major revision to the Communications Act of 1934, took place in 1996, a time preceding the emergence of a mission critical Internet for most people. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
Bear in mind that the last major revision to the Communications Act of 1934, took place in 1996, a time preceding the emergence of a mission critical Internet for most people. [read post]
