Search for: "People v. Lockwood"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
A horrible set of facts confronted the First Department yesterday in People v Dickerson, 2007 NY Slip Op 04718 where the Court had to decide whether the starvation constituted depraved indifference murder, or criminally negligent homicide. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm
David Cassuto From the email: The DePaul Center for Animal Law cordially invites you and your colleagues to join us for this year’s symposium, “Revisiting the Line between Free Speech and Obscenity: U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
The People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 6:17 am
In Lockwood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Aynes, “Bradwell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:28 pm
Ct., Lockwood Twn, 2009])(but see, People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
[vii] Thus, directors, officers, managers and similarly situated people need to closely examine the governing documents of the entity to determine what protection, if any, is conferred. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
"Federalism" in this sense is a national policy of a national people that this national people could change at will through an Article V amendment or by changing the composition of SCOTUS or some other formal or informal constitutional means. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:38 am
Corbello v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:16 am
”); Lockwood v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
” As part of a night celebrating the life and career of Belva Lockwood, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over a moot court re-enactment of Bradwell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:09 pm
Look at a case from Australia called Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v. [read post]
