Search for: "People v. Lopez" Results 1 - 20 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
  It may not make rational sense, but people aren't uniformly rational animals.Case in point. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez, but instead informed agent Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out.The agents arrested Lopez and followed the caller’s instructions, which led them to pick up two people, whoadmitted to being Mexican citizens without documents." [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:29 am by Josh Blackman
But what most people do not know is that someone paid Lopez $40 to give the gun to someone at the school. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:05 pm
Lopez will not successfully challenge his three-strikes sentence -- notwithstanding the passage of Proposition 47 -- is an understatement. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Some of you might remember an AWA case in Florida that I blogged about some time ago: People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
Sometimes people get footnote-happy when they write opinions. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
  Of that I have little doubt.Though I wonder what history will say about locking people up for nearly twenty years for this type of stuff. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by Susan Brenner
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez-Cruz, but instead informed Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Supreme Court's analysis, please use this link: New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
” As a narrow majority of the Supreme Court had explained in Garcia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm
This -- among many, many other reasons -- is why you should not visit a prostitute, and surely should not pull into a back alley to receive your promised services.Because you might well get shot and killed. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
In a post earlier this week, I waxed poetic about the term "scrap," which was discussed in an opinion by the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday and is a derogatory term for members of the Sureño gang that is often employed by members of the rival Norteño gang. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:48 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316, 321 [1984], cert denied 472 US 1007 [1985]). [read post]