Search for: "People v. McCallum" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Call to Action 27 reads: We call upon the Federation of Law Societies of Canada to ensure that lawyers receive appropriate cultural competency training, which includes the history and legacy of residential schools, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Treaties and Aboriginal rights, Indigenous law, and Aboriginal–Crown relations. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:16 am by Michael Oykhman
The court, as per R v McCallum, 1970 CanLII 594 (SKQB), has established that if it is found that the accused gave false evidence, with knowledge of the facts, it was with an intention to deceive; people only lie to mislead. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Justice William Crain's opinion today (joined by Justices Scott Crichton, James Genovese, Jay McCallum, and Jefferson Hughes III) in State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Facebook will also launch a new scam ads reporting tool and a dedicated team of people to act upon such reports. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
But there was no reference at all to this position in Channel 5’s programme, which portrayed the Claimants as “ordinary private people”. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Live Science has examined how the Net Neutrality debate affects people’s Internet. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Live Science has examined how the Net Neutrality debate affects people’s Internet. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment Bath and North East Somerset Council v the mother & Ors [2017] EWFC B10 (27 February 2017)  An ‘ordinary’ case in the family court described by HHJ Wildblood as showing the truly pitiful plight of a mother caught up in drug addiction. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Oscar Kazal v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 44 McCallum J struck out a defence of contextual truth and particulars of mitigation. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am by INFORRM
” Justice Burns likened the present case to French v Fraser, in which Justice Lucy McCallum referred to the plaintiff as “the target of a senseless vendetta founded in madness”. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Graeme Cowper v Fairfax Media Publications is continuing before a McCallum J and a NSW Supreme Court jury. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 10:21 am by INFORRM
There has been some judicial support for this principle in Australia, most notably Justice McCallum in Bleyer v Google Inc, but there has also been judicial criticism and resistance. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 5 February 2016 McCallum J gave judgment in the case of Cheikho v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No.4) [2016] NSWSC 29. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws”. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 30 November 2015 McCallum J gave judgment in the case of Toben v Nationwide News Pty Ltd; Toben v Mathieson [2015] NSWSC 1784. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
In an article in the National Post last week, Justice Belobaba is described as having ‘scorched’ Merchant Law Group for its “profoundly unacceptable fee agreement” with its client, the class representative in McCallum-Boxe v. [read post]