Search for: "People v. Mitchell (2001)" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
” Proving that a murder was “planned and deliberate” can arise out of circumstantial evidence (see: R v Mitchell, 1964 CanLII 42 (SCC), [1964] SCR 471). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Failinger, Professor of Law, Mitchell Hamline School of Law--Reflections on Nomos: Paideic Communities and Same Sex Weddings   Russell G. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:28 am by Amy Howe
Mitchell was tried in federal court in 2003 before a jury made up of 11 white people and one Native American. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Harvard, 2001) Larry D. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That's unfathomable, really.Appleseed's recommendations will ring familiar to Grits readers:(1) End jail bookings for Class C misdemeanors.(2) End most jail bookings for offenses eligible for citation.(3) Quickly release most people after jail booking on personal bond.(4) Implement diversion programs.(5) Analyze local data to develop local solutions to reduce jail use.Grits is delighted to see so much additional data produced about Class C misdemeanor arrests just before the… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]