Search for: "People v. Nara"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
And that is something that people have now seen and it couldn’t be more clear. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 6:05 am
Litigation in the case, Thompson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
Trump’s chief of staff, tells others he will take care of it, according to people familiar with the matter. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm
Throughout the filing, the department takes pains to set out evidence that could speak to the intent of Trump and the people around him—beginning with its description of the referral from the National Archives. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Last April, I wrote a blog post that acknowledged the people who once lived on the land on which NARA’s flagship building is now located. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Last April, I wrote a blog post that acknowledged the people who once lived on the land on which NARA’s flagship building is now located. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
Indeed, Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
In the first, United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:18 pm
” Moreover, in Kissinger v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:43 pm
Reprinted from The Government Contractor, with permission of Thomson Reuters. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]