Search for: "People v. Nave"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
The statement of need includes anecdotal information that the Minister of the Baptist congregation, “one of several people who have previously tripped over the legs on the current long benches owing to their awkward design”. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
It was also pointed out that with the benefit of a WC and kitchenette it would be possible to open the church to the hundreds of people that pass by while walking the Hadrian’s Wall trail; “this could generate extra income for the Church by attracting donations or through the sale of light refreshments” [23] (?). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
The revised proposals relating to the nave and aisle floor, [38] to [42]; Provision of new limecrete slab, floor finish and underfloor heating, [43] to [47]; The removal of the pews, [48] to [51]; The replacement of the pews with stacking chairs, [52] to [61]. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
I only cared about business but not about the people around me. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
In addition to the more contentious issues of the replacement of the two wooden and glazed draft lobbies, the Chancellor addressed the removal and disposal of a nave altar, installed previously without permission, and the introduction of a new bespoke altar [1(4)]. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:48 pm
The plaintiffs in the case, Tanzin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
At issue in the case, known as Tanzin v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:30 pm
Anita Budziszewska, The Right to Culture in International LawSiegfried Wiessner, Human Rights and Cultural Identity: The Case of Indigenous Peoples Alexandra Xanthaki, Women’s Rights v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Elisabeth Fontugne, Respecting Religion: How Court and Congress Impermissibly Treaded on Sacred Ground to the People's Detriment, (December 15, 2015).Jared A. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
In the case, People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
In the California case of Donovan v RRL, the court found that obvious mistake voided the contract. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
" (People v. [read post]