Search for: "People v. Nye"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Is there online discussion by possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 2:53 pm
From Chief Judge David Nye's decision yesterday in Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:31 am
” Critically, the opinion relied on Nye & Nissen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
Whilst the number of people marrying in England and Wales at 16 or 17 is small and continues to decline – only 134 out of nearly 235,000 marriages in 2018 – the purpose of the Act is to address the practice of child marriage through raising the minimum age of marriage and civil partnership to 18. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:34 pm
[A federal court holds that New York can restrict alcohol sales when NYE falls on a Sunday] UPDATED: Not sure what happened when I tried to post before, but here's what I was trying to say: It may be hard for people to believe, but even the city that doesn't sleep occasionally takes a break from drinking. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Div., Dep’t of Human Res. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
Green, decided yesterday by Chief Judge David Nye (D. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
This brief section became much more elaborate, and, by 2021, objectionable content had six categories, including (1) defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited content; (2) realistic portrayals of people or animals being killed, maimed, tortured, or abused; (3) depictions that encourage illegal or reckless use of weapons and dangerous objects, or facilitate the purchase of firearms or ammunition; (4) overtly sexual or pornographic material; (5) inflammatory religious commentary or… [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:56 am
" Doe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am
” Nye v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 12:41 pm
Nye), which lays out some of the constitutional issues: [1.] [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Nye and I (with the help of UCLA School of Law student Skyler Ross) have filed an amicus brief, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
Passion will likely cause people to say things they might later regret--if they are lawyers; otherwise, the strategic (mis)use of this blocking might be too tempting to pass up. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 7:21 am
The principle gets its name from R v. [read post]
