Search for: "People v. Pooler"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
But the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Wesley and Menashi) rejects that theory. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
But the courts want you to produce evidence of these discriminatory motivations that many plaintiffs are unable to deliver.The case is Tassy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:36 am
That reasoning helps people going forward, but it does not help plaintiff, but that legal principle was not in place when this case arose in 2017. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:58 am
" In Erving v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:19 am
These cases include Knoeffler v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
This case asks when the arbitration "agreement" in a consumer transaction can be invalidated.The case is Soliman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
The answer is four years.The case is Vega-Ruiz v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:18 am
The Second Circuit also orders injunctive relief in favor of the abortion providers.The case is People of the State of New York v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:06 am
The case is Clerveaux v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:27 am
Pooler, and Susan L. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:01 am
In this instance, we got a New York State Court of Appeals ruling, People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
That arrest was legal also, says the Court of Appeals (Calabresi, Pooler and Park). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:34 am
The district court denied the motion to unseal the material.The Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Pooler and Droney) resolves the appeal this way:1. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:26 am
The officer also had a reasonable basis to believe his warnings made their way to the student, as the school-people conveyed them through sign language. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
In this case, the protester loses.The case is Higginbotham v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:24 am
Anyway, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Holt v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
For the first time, the Second Circuit (Katzmann, Walker and Pooler) holds that excessive force claims under the Fourteenth Amendment are resolved under an objective standard, a holding arising from the Supreme Court's ruling in Kingsley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 5:52 am
This is a rare pro-plaintiff false arrest ruling from the Second Circuit.The case is Tuccillo v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:47 am
In Franklin v. [read post]
