Search for: "People v. Powers (1984)" Results 1 - 20 of 598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
It should be no surprise that lawyers have significant powers to ensure that they get paid in an Illinois divorce court. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
CCNV (1984)), and the government's power to limit the use of property used for a public university is even greater than its power as to parks (Widmar v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
He spoke at my alma mater, the University of Notre Dame, in 1984. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
That concept is distinguished from the more traditional concept that embeds people in time, but that human institutions and collective ordering realities exist out of or outside of time. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Lisa Heinzerling
The President can fire people, but he cannot make them do anything important. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Russia’s tools are force and hard power; Ukraine resists with smart power alliances, democracy, and international law. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
It no longer needs to participate in standard democratic argument and discussion, rather it has exported its power. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]