Search for: "People v. Prescott" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The gesture given by Andrea Jenkyns was with single middle finger, whilst Baroness Trumpington and John Prescott used the two finger “V sign”. 13. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
   In reading the Lufthansa decision, readers may be reminded of the judgment of Peter Prescott QC in Folding Attic Stairs v Loft Stairs [2009] EWHC 1221 (Pat) where the Court noted that is important not to define the art too narrowly, limited to a small band of persons making the precise products in issue, or this could have the impermissible result that any prior user no matter how obscure could be deemed to be common general knowledge. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
(AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki) So held the Oklahoma Supreme Court yesterday in Prescott v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
Hostility to privacy injunctions is not, as Lord Prescott fondly imagines, a conspiracy by newspapers to preserve profits. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
On the same programme Lord Prescott expressed trenchant views saying to Baroness Buscombe “you’ve got no control over the editors at the Press Complaint Commission. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
They are already compromising their supposed right to intrude into people’s privacy through the offices of the PCC. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 12 May 2011, the Administrative Court will hear the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (Queen (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]