Search for: "People v. Price (1986)"
Results 1 - 20
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“By definition these were people who had never written a book. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
It would be utterly self-funded too with the price horn commands within the existing markets, with many many thousands of dollars changing hand within this vile trade. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
The criminal gang responsible for this theft sold the Buddha heads to a dealer from Chengdu at $1500, and they then sold them to a buyer from Southeast China for $18,500.[16] It often happens that the stolen work doubles or triples in price each time it is transferred to a new buyer. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 10:22 am
People break up. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Austria (1986) 8 E.H.R. 407: “The limits of acceptable criticism are accordingly wider as regards a politician as such than as regards a private individual” [39]. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:56 am
Schutte v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
Price, 876 F.3d 573, 579 (4th Cir. 2017). [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Or are they representing and serving a class of people not reflecting the diversity of the public? [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
” Maurer v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
Though it is expensive in terms of foregone investment, the price appears to be cheap enough to prevent change. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:16 am
DeCostanzo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
