Search for: "People v. Reynolds (1989)" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What it was attempting to do was to make the point that the Supreme Court had never come close to offering a cogent analysis of what it actually meant by “one person/one vote” and therefore the mantra of “equality” in voting power, which, after all, was the basis of Reynolds v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  People came rushing in to buy land, and an era started to pass. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Partlett (Emory), Jonathan Peters (Georgia), Michael Perry (Emory), Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Tennessee), Ani B. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]