Search for: "People v. Smith (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Normative foundations of business may include the moral and not only economic value of promises, morally articulated fiduciary duties of agency (including duties of care, candor, and loyalty), and the obligation to show respect to all business participants, including a moral imperative to treat employees and customers as people who deserve dignity and due recognition – and not merely as means to the ends of making profits for others.[20] Adam Smith and his followers in… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
” Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The Claimant sought to add the DPA 1998 to the claim after the Defendant highlighted that the Dossier was produced in 2016, before the enactment of the 2018 Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Rohl, Ray Smith, and L. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The play’s trip to the public domain was further delayed by 1998’s Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA), which extended the term of copyright protection for subsisting copyrighted works by an additional 20 years. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
And there are the people who stop doing business with you. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
Globe Int'l, Inc., 965 P.2d 696, 707 (Cal. 1998); Fogus v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
However, we’ve just got rid of section 60 of the Competition Act 1998, which obliged the UK courts to interpret those laws consistently with the EU Court of Justice. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
The claimant fell short of the threshold imposed by s.12(3) Human Rights Act 1998, that the court must be satisfied that the applicant is likely to establish that publication should not be allowed. [read post]
