Search for: "People v. Stone (1981)"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
Under the 1884 Act, the Garden Building would have been prima facie unlawful, but the Disused Burial Grounds (Amendment) Act 1981 excluded from the 1884 Act certain cases, provided either no interments or relevant objection had occurred in the during the preceding fifty years immediately before the proposal to erect a building. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm
For example, in the 1981 case of Stone v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
The El Mocambo palm enjoyed legal protection as a registered trademark from 1981 onward, until it was expunged in 1997 for failure to renew. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:30 am
The Sustainability Stone. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:07 am
{Gottwald was named one of a hundred most creative people in business but was not selected as a judge in American Idol and did not receive a star in Hollywood's walk of fame.} [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:56 pm
Stone (1995) 420 Mass. 843, 852; but see Falwell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court confirmed in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146 (1981). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
KSR v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Stone, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General, attorney).Marc S. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
It is styled Paramount National Life Insurance v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
The 87-year-old Bond star denied making advances towards Debbie Newsome during the filming in 1981. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
S. 361, 364 (1981), we observed that this right was designed to assure fairness in the adversary criminal process. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Norton, 1981. [read post]
