Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Dai-re) (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
We all should wonder why it happened without much opposition from this diverse United States.The 1970s and 1980s Are the Seedbed for the Current Supreme Court’s Conservative MakeupIn 1971, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower court decision in Coit v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Back in the day, I would do an "instant analysis" of court decisions. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:53 am by Mark Ashton
The Superior Court panel found the trial court opinion so compelling that they affirmed and published the lower court opinion. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Jane Turner
In 1980-1981, when Gill was eight years old, her family moved to Phoenix. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
In February, he re-posted a video and numerous Facebook comments originally posted to the web by Hopkinton resident Kathryn Narcisi. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]