Search for: "People v. Vance"
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
“A show about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices who interpret it for the rest of America,” episodes of note include The Fear of Too Much Justice on how the Supreme Court and the justice system treat people of color, the poor, and the sick and The Family Roe featuring a conversation with Joshua Prager who investigated and wrote a book on Roe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Vance, 328 N.C. 613, 617, 403 S.E.2d 495, 498 (1991) (“the common law of England. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
GermanyUser v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
” Sharp v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Defendant was the owner of the wrecked vehicle and there were no other people at the scene of the accident. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Act thus cannot be justified by Bishop v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:57 pm
The latter prong of the investigation led to the Supreme Court case Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Based on the book and other remarks by Pomerantz and Vance subsequent to the resignation letter, it appears that Vance issued no directive. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:37 am
Vance gave the traditional and correct answer. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 4:37 pm
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: The People of the State of New York v. [read post]