Search for: "People v. Walker (1988)"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
“Help me, Lord Walker! [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Yet, in People v Walker (4th Dept 9/30/11)) the Court held that a trial courtdid not err in refusing defendant’s request to allow defendant to present the testimony of a false confessions expert. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Yet, in People v Walker (4th Dept 9/30/11)) the Court held that a trial courtdid not err in refusing defendant’s request to allow defendant to present the testimony of a false confessions expert. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 7:58 pm
Walker, 83 2d 455 (1994); People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 a few weeks ago, in Walker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
People v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The appellants accordingly applied for compensation under the statutory scheme established by the CJA 1988. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
As millions of people eagerly await next week’s Supreme Court action in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
” Concrete Machinery, 843 F.2d at 606 (1st Cir. 1988); Rice v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Sept. 13, 2010); Walker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Co–op., Inc., 838 F.2d 268, 273 (8th Cir. 1988). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:01 am
Lewy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:23 am
In Kauk v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
App. 2005); Walker v. [read post]
