Search for: "People v. Woolley"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Inspired by Alice Woolley (now Justice Alice Woolley) who compiled several year-in-review lists when she was a professor (see, for example, here, here, here and here), in this column I look back on five areas of key developments in lawyers’ ethics and lawyer regulation in 2023. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
The Society has a duty to act so as to facilitate access to justice for the people of Ontario. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Litigation is the means by which people in our society sometimes resolve their differences. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Green v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Alice Woolley has written that she “actually welcome(s) the letter because it reveals the deeper debate, and allows the conversation to be about the real issue”. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 24 The Rules of Professional Conduct are no less strict. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
R. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Alice Woolley argued that he was, citing the opening paragraph of his majority opinion in Canada (Attorney General) v Igloo Vikski Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Editors: Alice Woolley is Professor of Law at the University of Calgary and Ethics Advisor to Calgary City Council. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:05 am
This very issue arose in R v Fraser (Fraser). [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 4:01 am
” This book deals with (at pp. 35-36; 122-124) ethical conflicts such as that in Spaulding v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
It is not surprising to me that people pay. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
These views include that there are only two types of people: protagonist and antagonist. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:17 am
One such case is Nigel Woolley and Timesource Ltd v UP Global Sourcing UK Ltd (formerly Ultimate Products Ltd) and Lacmanda Group Ltd (formerly Henleys Clothing Ltd) [2014] EWHC 493 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling of Judge Pelling QC sitting as a judge of the High Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:56 am
So he was glad to read the judgment of the England and Wales Court of Appeal, right at the end of term, in Woolley & anor v. [read post]
