Search for: "Peters v. Poole" Results 1 - 20 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm by Emma Babler
Rev. 335 (2023) by PETER CARSTENSEN, UW Law School, and Annakathrin Marschall, UW Law School This Article both explains the nature of the problems with the contemporary legal analysis of agreements to exchange or pool competitively sensitive information, and proposes a better analysis based on core functional principles central to Section 1 jurisprudence. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Gregory Bacon (Bristows)
On the latter point, so too will having a broader pool of authorised representatives acting before the various Local Divisions. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
It is presented in a markets respectful way--that valuation and accessibility will in the long run produce a larger and more talented pool of labor and consumers that will enhance corporate and societal value. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
It explores the deaths of Peter Farquhar and Ann Moore-Martin in Buckinghamshire in 2014 and 2017 and the subsequent events including the police investigation and 2019 criminal trial of Ben Field. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
It is superfluous for cases such as Ericsson v Apple, costly and lengthy for the litigants, and clogs the court system. [read post]