Search for: "Peterson v. Public Service Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
The Secret Service is investigating. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
APCC Services, Inc., 554 U.S. 269 (2008). 2136-37. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Republicans have waged a pressure campaign that has included public Twitter offensives and private discussions with Google executives. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
The commission’s members included Kamala Harris, then the state’s attorney general and now the vice president of the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom… [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
At various points in the Opinion (notably [56] and [97]), he suggests that a communication to the public “corresponds to the transmission of a work”. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm
Rules of Procedure and Code of Conduct as updated and adopted by Commission; includes right to at least one hearing (open to public) before panel held in capital of responding party; opportunity for initial and rebuttal written submissions (to be made public); confidential information protected; electronic document filing. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:33 pm
City of Norfolk, Va., 811 F.3d 625, 628-29 (4th Cir. 2016) (holding that sign ordinance exempting from regulation "works of art which in no way identify or specifically relate to a product or service" was a "content-based regulation that d[id] not survive strict scrutiny") with Peterson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Why public benefit corporations? [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
On 21 June there was a statement in open court in West v 24 Seven Fostering Services before HHJ Parkes QC. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
See, e.g., Peterson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
[Peterson, E. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am
Luke Eric Peterson of IA Reporter) and the Indian Express (daily news paper).In this post, we mention a few details about the Investment Arbitration. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
