Search for: "Petition for Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 32,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 9:20 pm
After a thorough review process, our client’s EB-1 petition was approved, despite the absence of traditional academic citations and publications. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 8:08 am
The assistant was arrested in March 2023 and pleaded guilty to a Class A misdemeanor for petit larceny in February 2024. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 8:08 am
The assistant was arrested in March 2023 and pleaded guilty to a Class A misdemeanor for petit larceny in February 2024. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
But, in this case, the Board’s regional Director then filed a petition under Section 10( j) of the National Labor Relations Act, which authorizes it to seek temporary injunctions against employers (and unions) while a case is pending at the Board. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark ‘Trump Too Small’ Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 6/13/2024 The U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:36 pm
There is no fee for filing the petition. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
E.M.D. petitioned for review, arguing that six other courts of appeals hold that exemptions only need to be established by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:34 am
The next round of quarterly hearings on petitions for executive clemency before the Illinois Prisoner Review Board is scheduled to take place in Springfield, Illinois, from July 8th through 10th, at the Crowne Plaza Hotel located at 3000 South Dirksen Parkway. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
Patterson’s RFA, the panel quotes from the WCJ’s Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (R&R). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
As this Cooley PubCo blog points out, the NRDC and the Sierra Club have now filed unopposed motions seeking voluntary dismissal of their petitions for review, both saying they’re planning to focus their limited resources to advocate for further disclosure outside of the litigation. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
More problematically still, the analysis of the Colazzo court drew heavily on standards of review and other doctrinal formulations plucked explicitly from U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:02 am
The blog's Cases section includes helpful overviews of the issues under review, with links to relevant case documents. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Salix has petitioned for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel majority improperly found facts in the first instance rather than reviewing and analyzing the district court’s fact-finding as required by precedent. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:45 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review, alleging that the new requirements were “unnecessary and overly burdensome. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:32 pm
The district court granted EPA’s motion to dismiss, finding that EPA granted the petition The post Appellate Court Affirms Decision That TSCA Section 21 Petition Seeking PFAS Testing Is Not Subject to Review appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:32 pm
The district court granted EPA’s motion to dismiss, finding that EPA granted the petition The post Appellate Court Affirms Decision That TSCA Section 21 Petition Seeking PFAS Testing Is Not Subject to Review appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:20 pm
Paley, Washington asks the justices to grant review and reverse the 5th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
Regular Reviews: Periodically review ownership documents to ensure they align with current intentions and legal standards. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
The Medical Board accused Siew of gross negligence related to the care of six patients, repeated negligent acts, excessive prescribing, failing to to maintain adequate and accurate medical records, and failing to review patients’ controlled substance history using a state database before writing them prescriptions, according to a petition filed in January. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Vichy’s petition alleged the County violated CEQA by erroneously determining it had no regulatory responsibility for the Project, thereby allowing it to go forward without review, and that the City had committed multiple CEQA violations with regards to the permitting of the Project, most notably Vichy alleged the City improperly determined the project was not subject to CEQA. [read post]
