Search for: "Petition of Ash"
Results 1 - 20
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
Taking up the State’s discretionary petition, the Supreme Court first noted that under State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Humphreys Ch. clarified that no permission for such actions was granted, and if this was required, a further petition must be brought [10]. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
Cremation entails the reduction of the body to ashes through intense heat. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:17 am
When his family learned what had happened, they petitioned for a faculty for his exhumation. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
I took the step of directing such a hearing due to the petition including applications for multiple confirmatory faculties due to the following unlawful actions taking place: a. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:03 am
There is nothing in Christian doctrine suggesting that any spiritual benefit could follow from such treatment of the remains of the dead; on the contrary, the principle of the permanence of the committal of remains to the earth, the requirement to treat such remains with dignity, and the near-universal Christian practice to maintain the separation and identification of remains where possible, all tend against allowing this Petition”. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
In practice, however, until the remains of the deceased are interred, there is ample opportunity for obtaining a sample of ashes for conversion into jewellery. [*] Footnote 9 of the General Synod Legal Advisory Commission Guidance Burial of a portion of a deceased’s body or ashes includes a summary of In the Matter of Carleton Cemetery (Blackburn Diocese, petition number 61 of 2015). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:27 am
“Sufficient interest” in faculty petitions, (15 January 2024). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 8:33 pm
Ruangkrai twice petitioned to have the party dissolved last year but the court dismissed the attempts. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
The Ecclesiastical Law Association summary stated: “The petitioner’s late wife’s ashes had been interred in the grave of her mother in 2019. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
Paul East Molesey [2023] ECC Gui 5 The petition contained a number of reordering proposals. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 1:06 am
Exhumation Other Re Spalding Cemetery [2023] ECC Lin 3 The petitioner who is of Polish origin sought to exhume the ashes of her mother’s ashes which were buried in 2013 in the consecrated area of the cemetery in Spalding; her intention is to have them interred in the grave of her father in Poland, according to his wishes [1, 2]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Apart form this exception, the petition was granted as sought [37], subject to conditions [38]. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
Scattering of ashes In Re Bretforton Cemetery [2023] ECC Wor 2, Humphreys Ch determined that the circumstances of the petition fitted within the legal exceptions to the doctrine of permanence and granted a faculty to allow: the cremated remains to be exhumed; a portion of the ashes taken for scattering; and the remainder of the ashes to be reinterred in the grave plot. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:51 am
The sole raison d’être of the Petition was to enable her father’s ashes mingled with her mother’s ashes, in order to fulfil her mother’s wishes contained in “Catherine Adams Will Trust – Statement of Wishes” signed and dated in 2009. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
” Commingling of cremation ashes, but not in Hereford In Re Hereford Cemetery [2023] ECC Her 1 the raison d’être of the Petition was to enable the ashes of the Petitioner’s father to be mingled with those of her mother’s ashes in order to fulfil her stated wishes. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:23 pm
This proposal was approved by the PCC in September 2020 and the petition was filed on 10 March 2023 [3]. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 3:12 am
…This petition is about the mortal remains of the Petitioners’ father. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:33 am
On February 21, 2023, the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed an Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) order granting Duke Energy Indiana (“Duke”) recovery of costs pursuant to federal Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) rules for treating coal ash and remediating ash ponds because the Commission had not yet approved the project, which constituted impermissible retroactive ratemaking. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:00 am
Ashes plots were significantly smaller, and the parish had recently started using a new area which could easily accommodate 25 to 30 new plots [11]. [read post]
