Search for: "Pfeiffer v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
UgandaUnwanted Witness-Uganda v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] Revised, and Expanded Version of The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. Massachusetts
20 Aug 2021, 3:23 pm
Pfeiffer did not die from smallpox. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am
Secondly, by examining more briefly the significance for the EU and its Member States of the change in the UK’s status from Member State to third country. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
Pfeiffer and Mr. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm
Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsangleichung Jürgen BASEDOW Soft Law for Private Relations in the European Union Spyridon V. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:00 am
In an example provided by LexisNexis, a Georgia case, Durrah v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
Leading Australian conflict of laws cases, including, for example, John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503, which adopted a lex loci delicti rule for intra-Australian torts, are premised on public law concepts essential to our federation. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:29 am
In Pfeiffer v Bachotet, 2018 WL 9563334(N.D. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
’” Pfeiffer v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
” Pfeiffer, 913 F.3d at 1024. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:30 am
In Pfeiffer v Bachotet, 2019 WL 190927 (11thCir., 2019) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a judgment of the district court which denied the petition of Plaintiff-Petitioner Marcellinus Pfeiffer, who sought the return of his children N.A.R. and R.H.E. from the United States to Switzerland. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Watts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Watts v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm
Development and implementation of an accompanying communication strategy; V. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:01 am
” In 1931 the Idaho upheld the 1929 law in State v. [read post]
