Search for: "Philips India Ltd., an Indian Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 2:56 am
The same principle was affirmed in November 2020 in Philips v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
In a similar factual matrix as Banyan Tree, the Delhi High Court in Casio India Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
e-Alert http://t.co/Z14rKpVwPG -> Eng.CA sends case back to CJEU ITV Broadcasting Ltd & Ors v TVCatchup Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 204 http://t.co/frClUO3ttD -> Facebook, New York Times deal could change the news biz http://t.co/1Drjkrl2pF -> The B.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:31 pm
‘Technical legal advice, reflections on the Indian patent system and insider guidance on monetizing IP come together at next week’s MIP India Forum’‘‘Companies need to learn that IP is extremely important and without it survival may be impossible. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
This position was affirmed by the Indian Supreme Court in Venture Global Engineering v Satyam Computer Ltd (2008) 4 SCC 190. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
La Societe Routin (EPLAW) Germany Much ado about kindergarten – debate over use of sheet music in nursery schools (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) India Judicial determination of a ‘well-known’ Indian mark- TATA: Tata Sons Ltd. vs Mr. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Spicy IP) Pondering the ‘legal’ competence of the IPAB (Spicy IP) First Indian patent institute symposium offered by Franklin Pierce Center for IP (Spicy IP) PCT filing trends (India Patents) Strengthening the Indian Bayh Dole bill: A provision for recovery in case of fraud? [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover ‘spectrum of undisclosed structures’:… [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Ltd v Underworks Ptd. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
- PARADIES trade mark dispute (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC finds patent covering cigarette packaging foil embossing technology valid and infringed; director and shareholder of first defendant personally liable: Boegli-Gravures SA v Darsail-ASP Ltd and Andrei Ivanovich Pyzhov (PatLit) EWHC clarifies 'link' in trade mark infringement dispute between Daimler and Sany (Managing Intellectual Property) Sue and settle - but who is the real winner? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
- PARADIES trade mark dispute (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC finds patent covering cigarette packaging foil embossing technology valid and infringed; director and shareholder of first defendant personally liable: Boegli-Gravures SA v Darsail-ASP Ltd and Andrei Ivanovich Pyzhov (PatLit) EWHC clarifies 'link' in trade mark infringement dispute between Daimler and Sany (Managing Intellectual Property) Sue and settle - but who is the real winner? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
– PARADIES trade mark dispute (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC finds patent covering cigarette packaging foil embossing technology valid and infringed; director and shareholder of first defendant personally liable: Boegli-Gravures SA v Darsail-ASP Ltd and Andrei Ivanovich Pyzhov (PatLit) EWHC clarifies ‘link’ in trade mark infringement dispute between Daimler and Sany (Managing Intellectual Property) Sue and settle – but who is the real… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Class 46) Member States simplify international design registration system (WIPO) (Class 99) Greece Court of Appeal of Thessaloniki: Trying to claim damages in Greece: RP ABEE ALL DAY vs ALL DAY (Class 46) India Indian ‘Bayh Dole’ Bill keeps stirring a hornet’s nest (Spicy IP) India’s Bayh Dole: A blind legal transplant? [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
Call ERIC (European Research Infrastructure Consortium) (IP finance) Germany German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht): Annual report for 2008 (Class 46) German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) finds SCHLÜSEL lacks distinctiveness for locksmith and security devices and services (Schlüssel means ‘key’) (Class 46) India Confederation of Indian Industry’s conference on combating counterfeiting and… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46) United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual Property… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46) Greece Well-known MOUYER trade mark… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor) India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP: The tales… [read post]
