Search for: "Phillips v. Gordon"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2023, 12:39 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
We agree with SDHR that petitioner failed to establish that she suffered an adverse employment action arising out of the refusal of the Rochester Police Department (RPD) to issue a smaller service weapon (see Matter of Gordon v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
We agree with SDHR that petitioner failed to establish that she suffered an adverse employment action arising out of the refusal of the Rochester Police Department (RPD) to issue a smaller service weapon (see Matter of Gordon v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has lost an IPSO complaint against The Spectator over an article about his so-called “Russian riches. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 17 May 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v Granath [2022] EWHC 1181 (QB) by Lewis J. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:38 pm
Phillip State Bank & Trust Co., 331 Ill. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
Ireland Gordon v Irish Racehorse Trainers Association [2020] IEHC 363 Bernard J Barton J refused to strike out the defence of qualified privilege and ruled on what should be said to the jury about evidence of the reputation of a witness. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
The defendants had sought to rely on the defence of qualified privilege; in Gordon v Irish Racehorse Trainers Association (No 1) [2020] IEHC 363 (04 March 2020), Barton J declined to strike it out; and, in Gordon (No 2), he found that there was sufficient evidence to permit the jury to consider whether that defence would be defeated by malice on the part of the defendants. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
They warned that ruling against Phillips would brand him a bigot, akin to a racist. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Background 126 claimants brought a group litigation action against the defendant bank in respect of alleged sexual assaults committed by Dr Gordon Bates. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The disclosure from Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, in four new pages of sworn testimony, confirmed his involvement in laying out a quid pro quo to Ukraine that he had previously not acknowledged. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
” At The Federalist Society blog, James Phillips explains why the pending cert petition in Kerpen v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
In Gordon v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies There was a statement in open court in the case of Osborn v Phillips. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Gordon v Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (Scotland), heard 13 December 2016. [read post]
