Search for: "Phillips v. Howard"
Results 1 - 20
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Howard Everson opine that "standardized tests are neither designed nor intended to select students for specialized academic programs (the way they are utilized in admissions screens). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Howard Everson opine that "standardized tests are neither designed nor intended to select students for specialized academic programs (the way they are utilized in admissions screens). [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Masterpiece Cakeshop again In Scardina v Masterpiece Cakeshop Inc (CO Ct App. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm
Today’s Neo-Brandeisians may have abandoned components of Brandeis’s antitrust program—namely, his commitment to “fair trade” and his distrust of big government—perhaps placing them in closer alliance to Judge Learned Hand’s antitrust logic in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
“Rocky” Rhodes & Howard M. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Ford Presidential LibraryKristin Phillips, Public Affairs Specialist, the Gerald R. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Ford Presidential LibraryKristin Phillips, Public Affairs Specialist, the Gerald R. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 6:59 am
Without citing Shelley, New York Times v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
[See Illinois Brick Company et al., v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:00 pm
• Fred V. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Blog post: Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions. * Some expert reports and related material: Howard Hogan. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Howard M. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:39 am
One of his judgments which garnered media attention and criticism from the (then) Home Secretary – Michael Howard- was the case of R v Home Secretary ex p Norney [1995] QBD 6 Oct. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
” At Notice & Comment, a blog from the Yale Journal on Regulation, James Phillips pinpoints a key passage from Justice Clarence Thomas’ majority opinion in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Howard Wasserman comments on the scope of nationwide injunctions by analyzing a footnote in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent, and James Phillips examines a footnote in Justice Elena Kagan’s concurrence and argues that it misreads the majority opinion Kagan joined in Our Lady of Guadalupe. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
McConnell’s Campaign Locked Out by Twitter for Posting Critic’s Profanity-Laced Video Louisville Courier-Journal – Ben Tobin and Phillip Bailey | Published: 8/7/2019 After sharing a video of a profanity-laced protest, U.S. [read post]
