Search for: "Phillips v. No Defendants Named" Results 1 - 20 of 539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
” A 1942 Court of Appeals ruling in Everett v Phillips, in which the court “refused to accept the argument that a transaction between corporations having common directors was voidable without regard to fairness,” nonetheless stopped short of overruling Munson “which continued to be cited favorably by the New York courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Daniel J. Gilman
On June 21, the FTC filed a complaint alleging that: For years, Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Phillips v Murtha 2023 NY Slip Op 01767 Decided on April 04, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department demonstrates that several recurring attorney representation scenarios in wills and estates legal malpractice claims will fail for lack of standing. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
" An early and admiring biographer offered some confirmation of Phillips' statement. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Trial court denial of directed verdict for defendant Tallahassee Medical Center reversed on appeal. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
I have argued that the Constitution that needs defending from unwarranted criticism is the amended Constitution we have today, not the original Constitution of 1789. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Up first is Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued for cake artist Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm by Alden Abbott
    As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
The court called the defendants' argument "dead on arrival" and said their actions were "clearly unconstitutional. [read post]