Search for: "Phillips v. Quick"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
See Todd Phillips & Beau J. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
Phillips did go through a reeducation training program pursuant to Colorado law, did he not, Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court case—Groff v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 9:58 am
Phillips & Jordan, Inc., 2015 WL 5514627, (E.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Quick links Employment Writes: Grainger v The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster: “Is it right that that person should be deprived of a remedy because their non-theism is wrapped up in a cloak of spaghetti? [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:15 am
The Casta Paintings, created during the reign of Phillip V (1700-1740), reflect Mexican anxieties about miscegenation, and are contemporaries to Zabala’s request. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Craig Dennis Feiser, Mary Margaret Giannini, Assistant General Counsel, Jon Robert Phillips, Jason Robert Teal, Gabriella Young, O^ce of General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendants-Appellees. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:43 am
In Flood, Lord Phillips pointed out that the question of public interest is ‘not a black and white test’ [30]. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Reconsidering the Vertical Merger Guidelines and carefully scrutinizing vertical mergers The FTC and DOJ both were quick to announce that they are revisiting the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines, as “encouraged” by the Executive Order. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
But surely she is correct: in a post-West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
After a few days of misreporting on the opinion in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
Co. of Connecticut, 2003 WL 329054 (SDNY Feb. 13, 2003).The policyholder in Phillips did not appeal Justice Siwek’s corresponding order.Matter of Pottenburgh v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The Centre for Internet and Society has published an article that provides a “very quick and dirty rundown” of the EU’s new Digital Services Act (DSA), described as a “once in a generation overhaul of EU law governing intermediaries’ handling of user content”. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Some quick notes on leasehold related cases. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
